Economist and Professor of Finance has warned that persistent inefficiencies in the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) and other state-owned enterprises could push Ghana back to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for another financial intervention.

Speaking on JoyNews' Newsfile on Saturday, Prof Bokpin said Ghana cannot afford to return to what he described as “business as usual” after years of fiscal pressure caused by inefficiencies within state-owned enterprises.

“So if we go back to business as usual, it is just a matter of time and we have to resort to the IMF and the World Bank for another level of intervention,” he cautioned.

He said Ghana has lost between 2.5% and 3.2% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the past 15 to 20 years due to inefficiencies in state-owned enterprises, including ECG and the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD).

“Over the last 15 to 20 years, between 2.5% to almost 3.2% of our GDP is lost to the inefficiencies of state-owned enterprises alone, including ECG and then COCOBOD and the rest of them,” he said.

Prof Bokpin said the energy sector continues to place significant pressure on Ghana’s fiscal space because government has to make additional allocations to cover sector shortfalls.

He noted that these extra-budgetary allocations can sometimes exceed the combined budgetary allocations of the Ministries of Health, Food and Agriculture, and Education.

“If you look at the fiscal space that the energy sector alone takes, the extra-budgetary allocation that we have to make to cover the energy sector shortfall sometimes exceeds the combined budgetary allocation to the ministries of Health, Food and Agriculture, and Education,” he said.

He stressed that reducing losses across generation, transmission and distribution would require significant investment.

“There is no way we can reduce the level of losses from generation, transmission to distribution without a certain level of investment,” he said.According to him, government must therefore carefully consider how the investment gap will be financed without diverting scarce public resources from other critical sectors.

Prof Bokpin said the IMF-supported programme has improved transparency within the energy sector, particularly regarding the scale of losses and financial flows.

“What we should rather be seeing now as the effect of the IMF-supported programme is that there's a lot of transparency today in terms of even the extent of the losses going forward and the progress that we have made,” he said.

He also pointed to the cash waterfall mechanism as an area where some progress has been made.

“Today, the cash waterfall mechanism is working to some extent,” he said.

“You can credit that to the IMF programme because we know what was happening with the cash waterfall mechanism before.”

Rewrite this completely different and do it my style