
Ghana lost $11.4bn in gold trade leakages before GoldBod reforms – Sammy Gyamfi
3 mins read
28th March 2025 5:30:00 AM
2 mins readBy: Abigail Ampofo

Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has formally requested copies of petitions submitted to President John Dramani Mahama, which seek her removal from office.
In a letter dated Thursday, March 27, she appealed to the President for access to these documents, stating that she needs them to provide an informed response.
Her request follows President Mahama’s decision to consult the Council of State after receiving three petitions calling for her removal.
At the same time, Vincent Assafuah, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, has taken legal action at the Supreme Court, challenging the process being used to handle the petitions.
Represented by former Attorney-General Godfred Dame, Assafuah argues that the Chief Justice must be given an opportunity to respond to the allegations before the President initiates consultations with the Council of State.
request for petitionsDownload
Minister for Government Communications, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, has confirmed that three petitions regarding the potential removal of the Chief Justice have been submitted to the Council of State, in accordance with Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.
Although the specific allegations remain undisclosed, this marks the initial phase of a constitutional process that could have far-reaching implications for Ghana’s judiciary. The Council of State is now tasked with reviewing the petitions and advising the President on the appropriate course of action.
Meanwhile, Chief Justice Torkornoo has formally written to the President, requesting a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations before any further steps are taken.
“I am by this letter humbly and respectfully asking His Excellency the President and eminent members of the Council of State to forward the petitions against me to me, and allow me at least seven days after receipt of same, to provide my response to you, which response can then form part of the material that you conduct the consultations anticipated under 146 (6), before the possible setting up of a Committee of Inquiry under Article 146 (7),” she stated.
3 mins read
1 min read
3 mins read
3 mins read
2 mins read
3 mins read
2 mins read
2 mins read
2 mins read