Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, the Member of Parliament (MP) for North Tongu, has raised serious concerns about the ongoing "legacy head office" construction project and has called for increased transparency in its execution. The project has come under scrutiny for its alleged lack of openness, budget overruns, and perceived deviations from proper procurement procedures.

Ablakwa's criticism is directed at what he refers to as the "MisGovernor Addison," an individual associated with the project. In a strongly-worded statement, Ablakwa expressed dismay over the secrecy surrounding the total cost of the project. Despite official press conferences and statements, Ablakwa highlights the absence of a clear disclosure of the project's expenses. Notably, he claims that the project's cost has ballooned to US$222.79 million, a figure that excludes the land acquisition cost. Ablakwa's statements suggest that the lack of transparency raises concerns about accountability.

The MP also draws attention to the budget overruns that have plagued the project. Originally approved by the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) with a budget of US$81.8 million, the project's current cost stands at nearly three times that amount. Ablakwa's criticism implies that the substantial increase indicates a lack of prudent financial management and raises questions about the decision-making process.

Ablakwa further raises issues regarding the financial implications of the project on the central bank. He cites alleged losses of GHS60.8 billion and negative equity of GHS55.1 billion that are attributed to the project. These figures, according to Ablakwa, underscore the detrimental impact of the project on the country's finances and have fueled growing discontent.

The MP also points out concerns surrounding the timing of the project. Ablakwa questions the wisdom of embarking on such an extensive project during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and continuing through subsequent economic challenges. He contends that starting the project during such times demonstrates questionable decision-making and priorities.

Procurement procedures have also come under scrutiny in Ablakwa's critique. He alleges breaches in these procedures, including claims that construction began before obtaining necessary approvals. Additionally, Ablakwa questions the use of specific sections of procurement law to justify certain actions, asserting that these actions have raised suspicions.

In light of these concerns, Ablakwa calls for increased accountability and transparency in the execution of the project. He emphasizes the need for proper investigations into the procurement process, budget management, and the partnerships involved. Ablakwa's statement underscores the importance of adhering to established regulations and upholding the highest standards of financial responsibility in major public projects.

As the controversy continues to gain momentum, Ablakwa's vocal criticism adds to the growing demand for greater transparency and oversight in the execution of the "legacy head office" project.