The Majority Chief Whip, Rockson Nelson Dafeamekpor, has advocated for a more structured approach to the vetting process, proposing that ranking members on the Appointments Committee be allocated specific time frames to pose their questions.

0

In his statement before the investigative committee, Dafeamekpor recognized the usual practice of granting ranking members unlimited time to interrogate nominees but suggested that this approach needs to be reassessed.

1

He recommended that the chairman establish clear boundaries, such as allowing each member to ask three primary questions, followed by three supplementary ones.

2

"He explained this would ensure a more structured and efficient process, with each member knowing they are allowed a maximum of six questions, regardless of how they are framed. "This would allow them to complete their inquiries within a reasonable time frame, whether 30 minutes or an hour”, he said.

3

He also expressed concern over the substantial influence afforded to the ranking member, pointing out that this could result in endless questioning. This is compounded by the fact that the ranking member can follow up on questions asked by other committee members.

4

He commented, “The ranking member has been given so much power to interrogate matters, sometimes to infinity. This poses a problem when they follow up on other members' questions. I don’t think it’s right.”

5

He pointed out that the ranking member should also have a designated time frame to ensure that the process remains equitable and organized for everyone involved.

6

Without these guidelines, he warned, “If the ranking member attempts to grandstand, the vetting could take days. There need to be clear guidelines in place to streamline the process.”

7

Mr. Dafeamekpor emphasized the need for well-defined, structured protocols to improve the overall fairness and speed of the vetting process.

8