Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has strongly criticised the government’s proposal to extend the special import levy from 2025 to 2028, describing it as a move that disregards the concerns of ordinary Ghanaians and importers.

Speaking on the matter in Parliament on Tuesday March 26, Afenyo-Markin expressed disappointment in what he called the government’s “ndaadaa” attitude (means a deceptive attitude) , accusing it of taking more from citizens without offering meaningful relief.

On his part, the extension disregards the struggles of ordinary Ghanaians and importers citing that it will burden citizens further without providing significant relief.

“We are also aware that there is this special import levy extension from 2025 to 2028. So this attitude of attempting to give one, take more—this ‘ndaadaa’ attitude—we can read in between the lines,” he remarked.

The Minority Leader stressed the need for the levy to expire as scheduled, highlighting its significance for importers. He urged the Finance Minister to give a firm assurance that there would be no extension.

He warned that any decision to prolong the levy would be a major letdown for importers who had been expecting its removal.

“This government is not really a government that cares about the ordinary Ghanaians because importers who are expecting an end to this special import levy will be disappointed. The private sector can only thrive if the government is giving them a breather,” ” Afenyo-Markin stated.

About the Special Import Levy

The Special Import Levy was introduced in Ghana through the Special Import Levy Act, 2013 (Act 861). It imposed a 2% levy on certain imported goods to generate revenue for the government. The levy was initially intended to be temporary, but its duration has been extended multiple times over the years.

It applies to a wide range of goods, including finished products and intermediary goods, and is collected alongside other import duties and taxes.

The levy has been a subject of debate, with critics arguing that it increases the cost of imports and places additional financial strain on businesses and consumers. Supporters, however, view it as a necessary measure to boost government revenue and fund development projects.