
Ebola: Ghana steps up border checks, monitors high-risk travellers for 21 days
6 mins read
1st August 2024 8:34:08 AM
2 mins readBy: Chris Kodo

The General Secretary of the General Agricultural Workers Union (GAWU), Edward Kareweh, has strongly criticized the government’s decision to eliminate subsidies for farmers, emphasizing that resolving mismanagement should be prioritized instead of abandoning the subsidy program.
Speaking on Joy News PM Express on Wednesday, Kareweh highlighted the critical role of subsidies in national development.
"There is no country that has developed without using it. If you mismanage your subsidy, you need to correct it…we shall not allow government to run away from giving subsidy because it is a tragedy for any government to say it won’t give subsidy," he said.
Mr Kareweh further elaborated on the need to manage subsidies efficiently without creating waste, pointing to the issue of fertilizer smuggling as a deliberate act that undermines the subsidy program.
"We must learn how to subsidize without creating waste. What we have done is deliberate regarding the smuggling of fertilizer to neighbouring countries to sell. We know those who are smuggling the fertilizer.
"People are responsible for ensuring that the fertilizer gets to a target group but they don’t do so. The Planting for Food and Jobs phase 2 is a nonstarter for trying to take away the subsidy. Don’t run away when there is mismanagement, you have to correct it."
Dr. Charles Nyaaba, the former president of the Peasant Farmers Association, also called for transparency in the phase 2 fertilizer distribution under the Planting for Food and Jobs program, criticizing the lack of clear criteria. "There is a component they claim the fertilizer is given for free, but it is only the Agric Ministry that determines which farmer qualifies to get it," he stated.
Dr. Nyaaba added, "The initial concept developed for the policy was fantastic but when it came to the implementation, they changed everything."
In contrast, Agricultural Economist Prof. Onumah disagrees with the emphasis on subsidies, advocating instead for credit facilities to support farmers. He noted, "apart from the World Trade Organisation (WTO) frowning on subsidies, farmers are also better off to get credit facilities."
Prof. Onumah argued that providing farmers with credit facilities would enable them to expand more effectively and compete in the market, thus making subsidies unnecessary. "Attitudinal issues with beneficiaries need to be addressed. If you give the farmers credit facilities, they can access the market and compete fairly, make a profit and pay off their loan facilities.
"Besides, the subsidies are not sustainable, let rather tool farmers with agricultural financing," he said.
6 mins read
2 mins read
4 mins read
4 mins read
3 mins read
3 mins read
2 mins read
3 mins read
3 mins read