Richard Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing ambulance procurement case, has staunchly defended the integrity of the process, asserting that both Cabinet and Parliament meticulously followed due diligence before approving the procurement.

His statement comes in response to legal scrutiny initiated by Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame, questioning the transparency and integrity of the procurement procedures.

Jakpa emphasized that the approval process involved rigorous scrutiny at multiple levels, ensuring that all ambulances met required standards and specifications.

He highlighted comprehensive evaluations conducted by both Cabinet and Parliament, which included detailed cost assessments and technical reviews, before final approval was granted.

According to Jakpa, these measures were implemented to secure the best value for public funds and to ensure high-quality service delivery within the health sector.

The Attorney-General's office had raised concerns about possible irregularities in the procurement process, alleging discrepancies in pricing and quality that could potentially lead to financial loss for the state.

In court, Jakpa presented extensive documentation to substantiate his defense, including meeting minutes, evaluation reports, and correspondence between relevant government entities.

He argued that these documents underscored the government's commitment to transparency and accountability in the procurement process, aligning with national laws and international best practices.