Former Attorney General Martin Amidu has strongly criticized the Ghana Bar Association (GBA) for its unreserved endorsement of the Chief Justice’s, Getrude Torkonoo's, decision to close courts in Bolgatanga. In a recent article, Mr Amidu described the GBA's support as “dangerous for our Constitution, democracy, and the rule of law,” cautioning that unwavering loyalty to administrative decisions could erode judicial independence.

Mr Amidu questioned the Chief Justice’s motivations, suggesting that such decisions should be grounded in independent judgment rather than influenced by the National Security Council. He highlighted the need for transparency, especially as elections approach, urging that administrative actions affecting court access should be scrutinized.

Mr Amidu also raised concerns over the unprecedented nature of the closures in Bolgatanga and surrounding areas, criticizing it as detrimental to citizens' rights. He argued that the Chief Justice’s rationale for the closures citing regional security concerns—was misguided, noting that Bolgatanga has not been directly impacted by the Bawku conflict.

Martin AmiduHe further emphasized the potential legal risks posed by the court suspensions, especially with elections imminent, arguing it limits citizens' access to justice and could delay the judicial review of election-related cases. Amidu called for parliamentary oversight on the closures, underscoring that such decisions should involve input from local legal stakeholders to protect public access to the justice system.

“We the People demand Parliamentary oversight of the administrative decision…to close the High Court in Bolgatanga and its environs,” he stated.